Secondary Levels of Intervention: Interventions that relate directly to an area of need; are different from and supplementary to primary interventions; are often implemented in small group settings; may be individu... More »

"If you don't have data you believe in, look for ways to gather data you can use. Once you are confident in the data, look at how you can best use the resources you currently have in place." [Read full story »]

— Brian Miller, Principal, IA

Submit your story and let your voice be heard too.

Why should we undertake Response to Intervention (RTI) when we already have several other initiatives going on in our district?

Response from Ann Casey, Ph.D.: RTI is a framework that could be used as an organizing tool for all of our work in education.  The main intent of RTI is to ensure students receive targeted instruction early so all students can be successful. In RTI, we integrate measurement/data systems to focus instruction by using a problem solving process.  These components are the framework...[read full response]

Submit a question to our experts.
What percentage of school staff are involved in RTI in your building?
RTI Action Network Discussion Boards

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottom Post Reply
TOPIC: Re:Consensus Building
#44
Consensus Building 3 Months, 3 Weeks ago  
I would love to hear ideas people had for consensus building activities for their staff. RTI can be an intimidating change for some people and any suggestions on how to effectively smooth the transition would be wonderful! Thank you!
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#47
Re:Consensus Building 3 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
This is a good question and I hear it a lot in workshops and presentations. While I've done enough reading on leadership to know that we're supposed to garner consensus at the beginning of a change initiative, we went a different route with RtI.

I've come to believe that those of us in education have spent so much time with the roll out of each successive innovation that our teachers are weary whenever we introduce something new. With this in mind, we didn't introduce RtI until we had already developed a fairly stable system. Then, I was able to point out to our staff, "Here it is, it's built and now we just need to use it. It will make everyone's life easier. It's not perfect yet, but with your help we'll continue to improve it." I won't say that I have consensus, but I do know that a lot of our teachers are trying things and using our system. Additionally, we brought in teacher leaders to work on interventions that they were passionate about. This enabled us to have a broad base of support since so many people were involved in the sub-parts.

I'm fortunate, we have a great staff who are committed to the students and doing the right thing. But, they also work very hard and don't want to waste their time on what might be impractical dreams. By making it real, I think that they are seeing the value it the system.

Charles
 
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply