Joe:
Thank you for "stretching" the conversation.
At the secondary level, particularly 9-12 there are fewer CBMs that we see at the elementary and middle school levels. There are a few solutions, but they are not perfect fits. Aimsweb is a highly touted solution. The quality of graphing and the relative ease of use makes it a nice solution. In terms of reading, it tops out at the 9th grade reading level. NWEA MAP assessments are also popular. Since these assessments don't offer something for the entire school, high schools are understandably reluctant to use them. More and more high schools are using them at the freshman level, or for ELL, SPED and some at-risk populations.
As an alternative, that meets the needs of high schools, is to design a tight system of formative and summative assessments and use Professional Learning Teams to develop the necessary validity and reliability to make the assessments viable as data instruments. A colleague of mine at Empowered High Schools has just written a piece on this. You can find it at
http://www.empoweredhighschools.com/blog/?p=42